论文部分内容阅读
目的评价润湿烧伤膏和磺胺嘧啶银乳膏治疗烧伤的经济效果和应用效果。方法选择100例住院浅Ⅱ°或深Ⅱ°烧伤患者,随机分为A组(n=50,采用润湿烧伤膏治疗)和B组(n=50,采用磺胺嘧啶银乳膏治疗),疗程14d,观察疗效及不良反应,并运用药物经济学原理进行最小成本-效果分析。结果 A、B两组的有效率分别为82%和80%,B组成本较低,更为经济。两组不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论低成本的磺胺嘧啶银乳膏治疗烧伤的经济效果优于润湿烧伤膏,在性价比方面更有优势,是烧伤创面治疗的理想药物。
Objective To evaluate the economic effects and application effects of moisturizing burn cream and silver sulfadiazine cream in the treatment of burn injury. Methods A total of 100 patients with superficial Ⅱ ° or Ⅱ ° degree burn in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into group A (n = 50, treated with moisturizing burn ointment) and group B (n = 50, treated with sulfadiazine silver cream) 14d, to observe the efficacy and adverse reactions, and the use of principles of pharmacoeconomic minimum cost-effectiveness analysis. Results The effective rates of A and B in both groups were 82% and 80%, respectively. The cost of B group was lower and more economical. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion The low-cost sulfadiazine silver cream is superior to moisturizing burn ointment in the treatment of burns and has the advantages of cost-effectiveness. It is an ideal medicine for the treatment of burn wounds.