论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨腔镜下与开放手术行会师术治疗后尿道断裂的特点。方法收集2003年1月至2010年12月期间本院住院且行腔镜下、开放手术行会师术治疗后尿道断裂的病例分别36例、52例的患者资料,并进行对比分析。结果腔镜下行会师术治疗组的手术平均持续时间、平均住院天数、手术失血剂量均、术后性功能受影响的几率比开放手术行会师术治疗组要少,(P<0.05);手术成功率二者差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腔镜下较开放手术行会师术治疗后尿道断裂具有操作简便、患者恢复快、医疗费用低、副作用小的优点,值得在临床上推广应用。
Objective To explore the characteristics of urethral rupture after endoscopic surgery and open surgery. Methods The data of 36 cases and 52 cases of urethral rupture in our hospital from January 2003 to December 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. Results The average duration of surgery, mean duration of hospitalization and blood loss in operation were significantly lower in patients undergoing endoscopic mastectomy than in open surgery undergoing mastectomy (P <0.05). The successful operation was successful The difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). Conclusions The endoscopic urethral rupture has the advantages of simple operation, quick recovery, low medical cost and small side effects. It is worth to be popularized clinically.