论文部分内容阅读
在《春秋》学史上,元末《春秋》学家赵汸研治《春秋》的最大特点是以义例说经。他考论鲁史与《春秋》之别,明辨史“例”与经“义”之分,提出了系统的以“策书之例”与“笔削之义”为核心的《春秋》书法义例说。其《春秋》义例学说,是在依据《左传》及杜预注、融通三传史法经义说、批判继承诸家义例书法说基础上的发明,不仅体系颇为严密完整,而且在方法论层面上形成了独具特色的《春秋》诠释学系统。赵汸的《春秋》义例学所体现出的会通经史、据传求经,由《左传》到《春秋》、由考证史法而辨析经义的治经理路,以及力纠唐宋以来舍传求经、虚辞说经、附会穿凿之弊端的经学理念,是其《春秋》义例学说的主要价值和贡献。
In the history of “Spring and Autumn”, the most characteristic feature of “Spring and Autumn” Zhao Yuan’s “Spring and Autumn” scholars in the late Yuan Dynasty is that it is explained by the example of righteousness. He examined the differences between Lu Shi and Chun Qiu, and discerned the distinction between history and the meaning of “” and proposed a system of “As the core of” Spring and Autumn “calligraphy example. Its ”Spring and Autumn“ doctrine of righteousness is based on the ”Zuo Zhuan“ and Du pre-note, through the integration of three literary history of Jing Yi, criticizing the succession of Zhu Jiayi calligraphy based on the invention, not only the system is quite tight and complete, and At the methodological level, a unique system of Chun Chun’s hermeneutics was formed. Zhao 汸’s ”Spring and Autumn“ Yi Instance reflects the history of the will pass, according to legend, from the ”Zuo Zhuan“ to ”Spring and Autumn“ The main value and contribution of its theory of ”Spring and Autumn" doctrine of righteousness have been studied since the Song dynasty.