论文部分内容阅读
我国行政复议制度并未涉及行政指导行为是否具有可复议性,但由于行政诉讼制度将行政指导行为明确排除在受案范围之外,尤其是不适当地强调行政指导行为的非强制性以及行政复议制度与行政诉讼制度的衔接,行政指导行为一直被排斥在行政复议的大门之外。从严格依法行政的角度看,将行政指导行为纳入行政救济范围不仅具有现实必要性,而且与我国行政复议制度也具有高度的契合性。依托行政救济机制,国家可对行政指导行为进行合法性审查与合理性审查,并可实现包括信赖利益和期待利益在内的相对人的权益保护。
However, the system of administrative litigation explicitly excluded the administrative guidance from the scope of the case, especially the improper emphasis on the non-compulsory nature of the administrative guidance and the administrative reconsideration System and administrative litigation system, administrative guidance has always been excluded from the door of the administrative review. From the perspective of strict administration according to law, incorporating administrative guidance into the scope of administrative relief is not only of realistic necessity, but also of a high degree of consistency with the system of administrative reconsideration in our country. Relying on the administrative relief mechanism, the state can review the legality and conduct a reasonable review of the administrative guidance and can realize the protection of the rights and interests of the relatives including the trust interests and the expectation of benefits.