论文部分内容阅读
本文概述2002～2003年“201条款”争端案的内容、进程和结局,并回溯到1994年的美国“主权大辩论”以及1998～2000年的“301条款”争端案,进行宏观的综合考察,指出“201条款”争端案实质上乃是晚近十年来美国单边主义与WTO多边主义大交锋的第三回合,是此前两次大交锋的继续和发展。三次交锋的实质都是美国经济霸权与多国群体经济主权之间限制与反限制的争斗;都是植根于美国在1994年“入世”之初就已确立的既定方针:力图在“入世”之后仍然推行其单边主义政策,以维护和扩大其既得的经济霸权。美国在“201条款”争端案中败诉之后,对上述既定方针毫无改弦易辙之意,其单边主义的霸权顽症可能随时复发,WTO多边主义仍然前途多艰。
This article outlines the content, process and outcome of the 2002-2011 “201 Terms” dispute case and goes back to the 1994 “U.S. Debate on Sovereignty” and the 1998 “2000” “Section 301” dispute case, Conducted a comprehensive survey on the macroeconomic situation and pointed out that the “201 clause” dispute is essentially the third round of the U.S. unilateralism’s major clashes with the multilateralism in the WTO in the recent ten years and is the continuation and development of the previous two major clashes. The essence of the three clashes is both the struggle between the restrictions on the economic sovereignty of the United States and the economic sovereignty of multi-national groups; all are rooted in the established principle that the United States established at the very beginning of 1994 that “the accession to the WTO” has been established: After entering the WTO, “still pursued its unilateral policy in order to maintain and expand its vested economic hegemony. After the United States lost a lawsuit in the ”201 “ ”dispute, the unilateralism of hegemony over chronic illnesses of unilateralism is likely to recur at any time. The multilateralism in WTO remains a daunting future.