在荒诞川剧《潘金莲》以其独特的革新风貌激起的众多褒奖声中,章诒和同志的文章《川剧〈潘金莲〉的失误与趋时》(以下简称“章文”)却以殊异的思辩,对该剧提出了几个重大的批评意见,这对于启发人们进一步深入冷静地思考该剧创作的功过得失及与之有关的一些问题,对于推动戏曲艺术的革新创造和理论批评空气的活跃,是颇有意义的。但笔者在思考中却觉得与“章文”的几个观点大有不同之处,因此也不揣冒昧,借此文提出,与“章文”作者商榷,并就教于各位方家读者。“章文”先是批评《潘》剧在写潘金莲的爱情史中,在对爱情问题的理解上,“犯了两个常识性的错误”,认为潘金莲“以自身行为表明,无论在法律、道德面前,还是在舆论、习俗面前,她都是一个理性服从于性欲,只有冲动(激情)而无爱情的人”,她“有急切 In the numerous remarks provoked by his unique style of innovation, Zhang Kan and his comrades, Errors and Timing of Sichuan Opera (hereinafter referred to as Zhang Wen) , This article proposed a few major criticisms of the play, which will inspire people to further and calmly think about the merits and demerits of the play and some related issues, and to promote the creative creation of drama and the theory of critical air Active, it makes sense. However, the author thinks that he is different from several views of “Zhang Wen” in his thinking. Therefore, he does not try to guess what to do. He proposes to discuss with the author of “Chapter Wen” and to teach readers of Fang Fang. In the history of love written by Pan Jinlian, “Zhang Wen” firstly criticized “Pan” drama, “making two common sense mistakes” in the understanding of the issue of love, and held that Pan Jinlian “shows by one’s own conduct that whatever law , In front of morality, or in the face of public opinion and custom, she is a man who rationally obeys sexual desire and has only impulse (passion) without love ”and she is" anxious