论文部分内容阅读
辩护权源于自然权利,兼具程序正义和实体正义法律价值。犯罪嫌疑人侦查阶段辩护权项下主要权利:第一,陈述权。从形式上表现为犯罪嫌疑人的义务;从内容上违反无罪推定原则和“不得自证其罪”。探讨侦查阶段赋予犯罪嫌疑人沉默权,并以加重量刑情节保障之。第二,委托辩护权。本文探讨:(一)将犯罪嫌疑人委托辩护权与侦查权置于同一起跑线;(二)加强立法保护辩护人的侦查阶段的调查取证权。“侦查阶段一名律师会见犯罪嫌疑人”合法却涉嫌辩护权的滥用,问题根源在于我国律师制度。
The right of defense originates from natural rights, which has the legal value of procedural justice and substantive justice. Criminal suspects in the investigation phase of the main rights under the right of defense: First, the right to state. From the formal performance of the suspect’s obligations; from the content violates the principle of presumption of innocence and “No self-incrimination ”. Probe into the suspect’s right of silence during the investigation stage and increase the penalty sentence protection. Second, to entrust the right of defense. This article explores: (1) placing the criminal suspect’s right of defense and the investigative power on the same starting line; (2) strengthening legislation to protect the investigating and obtaining evidence in the investigation stage of the defender. “A lawyer interviewed the suspect during the investigation stage ” The legal yet alleged abuse of the right of defense, the root of the problem lies in our lawyer system.