论文部分内容阅读
经营者违反安全保障义务的责任是一个亟待解决的问题,特别是第三人侵权时经营者应该负有什么性质的责任,消费者在经营场所被第三人侵权后应该基于何种法律进行救济,从《合同法》和《侵权责任法》角度审视此类案件,何者更有利于司法解决的问题尤为突出。文章主要对第三人侵权时经营者负有的安全保障责任的性质进行比较认定,提出应当从侵权法角度解决此类案件的观点,并论述了该观点的合理性。确定经营者安全保障责任的法律性质对于解决此类案件的定责问题有积极的意义。
The responsibility of the operator to breach the obligation of safety and security is an urgent problem to be solved. In particular, the third party should have the responsibility of what nature the operator should bear and what kind of legal remedies consumers should take after the third party infringes on the premises. , The problems of such cases being examined from the perspectives of “Contract Law” and “Tort Liability Law” are particularly prominent in the judicial settlement. This article mainly compares the nature of the security responsibilities assumed by the operators in the third party infringement, puts forward the opinion that such cases should be solved from the perspective of tort law, and discusses the rationality of this view. Determining the legal nature of the operator’s security responsibilities has a positive meaning to solve the problem of determining the responsibility of such cases.