外伤致筛骨骨折在法医临床鉴定中尤为常见,而《人体损伤程度鉴定标准》仅就眶骨、鼻骨骨折予以损伤程度评定,未对筛骨骨折予以界定。在实际工作中对筛骨骨折评定存在一些问题,笔者结合3个案例对筛骨骨折损伤程度鉴定新标准的适用进行分析。1案例资料案例1罗某,男,25岁。2014年1月26日自诉被人打伤眼部,查体:双侧眼眶、右鼻根部皮下出血。副鼻窦薄层CT扫描诊断:左侧筛骨眶板骨折伴窦腔 Traumatic suture fracture in the forensic clinical identification is particularly common, and “the standard of human injury,” only on the orbital and nasal fractures to assess the extent of damage, not to be defined on the fracture of the ethmoid. There are some problems in the evaluation of the fracture of the ethmoid bone in the actual work. The author analyzes the application of the new standard in the evaluation of the degree of fracture of the ethmoidal fracture combined with three cases. 1 case data case 1 Luomou, male, 25 years old. January 26, 2014 Private prosecution was wounded eye, physical examination: bilateral orbital, right nasal subcutaneous hemorrhage. Sinus thin thin layer CT scan diagnosis: left ethmoid orbital plate fracture with sinus cavity