案例五:胜利属于证券市场——从胜利股份股权之争谈我国委托书收购制度的立法完善

来源 :公司法律评论 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:jhh760606
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
[案情介绍]2000年3月25日,上市公司“胜利股份”的第二大股东通百惠服务有限公司发布公告,正式推出向胜利股份股东大会提交的董事会、监事会候选人和修改公司章程两项提案,并呼吁凡赞成提案而不能成行的在册股东可以委托通百惠行使表决权,从而拉开了我国历史上第一次真正意义上的“委托书收购”。事件原委是,2000年元月10日,胜利股份3000万法人股在深圳拍卖,以网络业为主营业务的民营企业通百惠公司竞买成功,以持有总股本13.77%的比例,超过原第一大股东胜利集团,成为胜利股份第一大股东。谁知 [Case Presentation] On March 25, 2000, Tongbaihui Service Co., Ltd., the second largest shareholder of the listed company “Victory Share ” issued a public notice formally introducing the board of directors and board of supervisors candidates submitted to Victory Share General Meeting and revising the company Articles of Association two proposals, and appealed to those shareholders who are in favor of the proposal and can not make it possible to entrust Tupperware to exercise their voting rights, thus opening the first real “acquisition of power of attorney” in the history of our country. The whole story of the incident was that on January 10, 2000, 30 million legal person shares of Shengli Co., Ltd. were auctioned in Shenzhen. Tongbuhui, a privately owned enterprise mainly engaged in the Internet industry, successfully bid for 13.77% of the total share capital, Victory Group, a major shareholder, becoming the largest shareholder of Victory shares. Who knows
其他文献