秦岭自然保护区群成本效益研究(Ⅰ)——成本效益比较

来源 :资源科学 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:fengyuguohou2009
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
本研究在秦岭自然保护区群成本效益计量研究成果的基础上,首先对秦岭自然保护区群的保护成本及效益进行了比较分析,同时修正了研究中的误差;采用利益相关者理论中的米切尔分类方法,找出了秦岭自然保护区群的成本承担者及效益分享者,并对其进行比较分析;最后文章对成本-效益进行进一步分析及发展趋势预测。研究结果表明:经过调整后的综合效益约为234亿元,其中生态效益约为188亿元;经济效益约为34亿元;社会效益约为12亿元;综合效益成本比为7.88。在成本效益比较分析表明保护区周边社区承担了过多的成本且产生了负效益,这也是引起社区与保护区矛盾最根本的原因。研究认为,随着国家社会经济的发展,保护区群的综合效益会呈上升趋势,国家有关部门应建立健全生态效益补偿机制。 Based on the results of cost benefit measurement in Qinling Nature Reserve, this study first comparatively analyzed the protection costs and benefits of Qinling Nature Reserve Group, and at the same time amends the errors in the study. Using the theory of stakeholder Cher classification method to identify the cost of Qinling Nature Reserve group beneficiaries and benefit-sharing, and its comparative analysis; the final article on the cost-benefit analysis and forecast the development trend. The results show that: after the adjustment of the overall efficiency of about 23.4 billion yuan, of which about 18.8 billion yuan ecological benefits; economic benefits of about 3.4 billion yuan; social benefits of about 1.2 billion yuan; cost-effectiveness ratio of 7.88. The comparative analysis of cost-benefit shows that the communities around the reserve have incurred excessive costs and have negative benefits, which is also the most fundamental reason for the conflict between the community and the reserve. According to the research, with the development of national economy and society, the comprehensive benefits of reserve groups will be on the rise, and the relevant state departments should establish and improve the compensation mechanism of ecological benefits.
其他文献
新古典主义主要基于力量博弈解释制度变迁,但实际上促进制度变迁的因素有三类:一是社会力量结构的自发变动,二是社会力量结构的自觉变动,三是对制度本质的社会认知提高。其中