论文部分内容阅读
作爲《春秋》三傳之一,《左傳》以記史豐富、内容詳瞻著稱。然而,自漢代開始,不斷有學者否定《左傳》爲《春秋》之傳。尤以清人劉逢禄撰寫《春秋左傳考證》之後,學界又興起了劉歆作偽說,全盤否定《左傳》的傳書身份。然而,此後經過激烈的論爭,時至今日,偽書論已被完全否定。~([1])不過,關於《左傳》是否傳《春秋》,仍是莫衷一是,懸而未決。由於受傳統資料的局限,學界近些年對該問題的探究相對停滯。值得
As one of the three books of Spring and Autumn, Zuo Zhuan is famous for its rich history and rich content. However, since Han dynasty, some scholars have repeatedly denied that “Zuo Zhuan” is the biography of “Spring and Autumn”. Especially in the Qing Dynasty Liu Fenglu wrote the “Spring and Autumn Zuo Jia research”, the academic community has also raised Liu Xin fake, a total denial of “Zuo Zhuan” pass book identity. However, after a fierce argument since then, counterfeiting has been completely denied to date. However, whether the “Zuo Zhuan” is “Spring and Autumn” is still unanswered, pending. Due to the limitations of traditional materials, the academic circles have been relatively inactive in their exploration of this issue in recent years. worth it