对于警方做出的这一行径,评论似乎明显有向学生一边倒的趋势:警方的做法侵犯了学生的人格权,被无故认定为犯罪嫌疑人伤害了学生的人格尊严。设身处地来想,假如自己是该校的学生,能接受被采血检测DNA吗?而警方的支持者则认为,该校盗窃案件已经如此猖獗,警方是以排查犯罪为目的,依法行使其职权,学生有义务配合公安机关。可见,站在不同立场则结论可能相反。 Commenting on this behavior by the police, it seems clear that there is a tendency toward one-sidedness with students: the practice of the police violated the student’s right to personality and was mistaken for the suspect’s human rights as a suspicion of the student’s human dignity. Put yourself in the mood to think that if you are a student at this school, can you accept DNA testing? And police supporters believe that the school has been so rampant theft, the police is to investigate crimes for the purpose of exercising their powers according to law, students Obligation to cooperate with public security organs. Obviously, standing in different positions may be the opposite conclusion.