论文部分内容阅读
目的:评估社会支持评定量表在消防部队基层官兵中使用的信效度,研究消防官兵获得的社会支持状况。方法:通过分层比例抽样在全国消防基层中队抽取1548名官兵进行社会支持评定量表测试,分析量表的内部一致性信度、重测信度、内容效度和校标效度,同时分析消防官兵获得的社会支持的特点。结果:总量表的Cronbach内部一致性信度系数0.723,重测信度0.921。用症状自评量表(SCL-90)量表把被试分为心理正常组和偏常组,两组人员在4个分量表上的得分的差异均达到显著性水平(t=3.27~5.484,P<0.01),量表具有良好的效标效度。对比军人常模,消防员在总分、客观支持和利用度上的得分要高于军人常模,而主观支持则低,差异均达显著性水平(t=-21.37~55.41,P<0.001)。结论:社会支持评定量表信效度可靠,消防员获得的客观社会支持及主观感受均与普通军人不同,消防部队有其特殊性。
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the social support rating scale used by grassroots officers and soldiers at firefighting units and to study the social support obtained by fire officers and soldiers. Methods: A total of 1548 officers and men of the firefighting grassroots squadron were selected by stratified proportional sampling to carry out social support rating scale test, and the internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, content validity and school-validity were analyzed. Fire officers and soldiers to obtain the characteristics of social support. Results: The Cronbach internal consistency reliability coefficient of the total scale was 0.723, and the test-retest reliability was 0.921. The subjects were divided into psychologically normal group and abnormal group with the SCL-90 scale, and the scores of the two groups reached significant levels on the four subscales (t = 3.27-5.484 , P <0.01), scale has good validity validity. Compared with the norm of servicemen, the score of firefighters in total score, objective support and utilization rate is higher than that of military norm, while the subjective support is lower, the difference is significant (t = -21.37 ~ 55.41, P <0.001) . Conclusion: The reliability and reliability of the social support rating scale is reliable. The objective social support and subjective feelings obtained by firefighters are different from those of ordinary soldiers. Firefighting forces have their own particularities.