《山海经》是一部难解之书，在近代，由于科学方法的不断进步，在《山海经》的学术研究方面也取得了不少成绩，冲破了传统的窠臼，开始从新的视角对《山海经》进行探索。但也出现了一种倾向，就是猜谜、比附的倾向，忽略了对史料的系统研究和比较，结论不少，认定不少，但往往根据不足。因而，把史料搞得精一点，对《山海经》的深入研究有特别重要的意义。本文通过《山海经》与《逸周书·王会解》、《楚辞》、《吕氏春秋》、《淮南子》的比较，对《山海经》的来源、构成和产生的时代提出了一些初步的意见，与学术界共同探讨 In the modern times, “Shan Hai Jing” has made a lot of achievements in the academic research of “Shan Hai Jing” because of the continuous improvement of scientific methods. It broke through the traditional stereotypes and began to reform the “ Shan Hai Jing ”to explore. But there is also a kind of tendency, that is, the tendency of quizzes and attitudes. The systematic study and comparison of historical materials have been neglected. Many conclusions have been found, many are found, but they are often based on shortcomings. Therefore, to make the historical data more refined, it is of particular significance for the in-depth study of Shan Hai Jing. Through the comparison of “Shan Hai Jing” with “Yi Zhou Shu · Wang Hui Xie”, “Chu Ci”, “Lu Shi Chun Qiu” and “Huainanzi”, this paper presents the origin, composition and generation of Shan Hai Jing Some initial comments, discussed with the academic community