论文部分内容阅读
相同中立者仲裁中的调解制度已成为我国仲裁机构的一贯的解决纠纷方式,我国《仲裁法》对此制度也未予以反对,但长期以来理论界对其存有质疑。相同中立者仲裁中的调解制度面临着混淆论、侵害论和危险论的挑战,但其本身也具有方便纠纷解决的各种优势。仲裁与调解有着共同的基础:意思自治,因此我国立法应当在遵循当事人意思自治的基础上坚持并完善此制度,以促进纠纷合理顺畅地解决。
The conciliation system in the same neutrality arbitration has become a consistent solution to disputes in China’s arbitration institutions. China’s “Arbitration Law” has not objected to this system either, but it has long been questioned by theorists. The mediation system in the same neutrality arbitration faces the challenge of confusion, infringement and danger, but it also has various advantages that facilitate dispute resolution. Arbitration and mediation have a common basis: autonomy of meaning, so our country’s legislation should adhere to and perfect this system on the basis of following the autonomy of party autonomy so as to promote a reasonable and smooth solution to disputes.