论文部分内容阅读
参考文献作为学术论文的有机组成部分,反映了论文的创新性与以往相关研究的关系。按照学术研究的基本规律和参考文献选择的基本要求,参考文献应选择最新的、有代表性的、权威性的和典型性的列出。但在学术精神扭曲变味、学术评价重量轻质、期刊评价中影响因子与互引率、高校排名榜等各种评价、排名的现实环境下,学术论文中出现参考文献大量的虚假“自引”“互引”现象。在对相关概念厘清的基础上,分析其本质是为获取不当利益,并重点剖析了产生的根源。
References as an integral part of academic papers, reflecting the innovative nature of the paper and the relationship between previous studies. According to the basic rules of academic research and the basic requirements for reference selection, the references should be the latest, representative, authoritative and typical. However, under the realistic environment of distorted and scholarly taste, light weight of academic evaluation, influencing factors and mutual inductances in periodical evaluation, ranking and other rankings of colleges and universities, there are a large number of false references in academic papers, “” Mutual lead "phenomenon. Based on the clarification of relevant concepts, the essence of the analysis is to gain improper benefits, and the root causes of the problems are analyzed.