论文部分内容阅读
2004年以来,我国和日本围绕着“东海划界问题”进行了一系列双边外交谈判。在谈判中,双方存在着很多分歧,其中最主要的分歧点是双方主张的划界原则不同。中国主张运用“公平原则”进行划界:我国大陆架自然延伸到冲绳海槽;专属经济区考虑各种因素,进行公平划界。而日本主张运用“中间线”划分中日东海大陆架与专属经济区。因此,廓清海洋划界的主要规则内涵,具有理论和实践的双重意义。
Since 2004, China and Japan have conducted a series of bilateral diplomatic negotiations around the “issue of the demarcation of the East China Sea.” In the negotiations, there are many differences between the two sides, the most important of which is the difference between the two sides’s principle of demarcation. China advocates the demarcation of “the principle of fairness”: the continental shelf of our country naturally extends to the Okinawa Trough; the exclusive economic zone considers various factors and carries out a fair demarcation. Japan advocated the use of the “middle line” to divide the East China Sea continental shelf and the exclusive economic zone between China and Japan. Therefore, the definition of the main rules of the maritime delimitation connotation, with the dual meaning of theory and practice.