论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨紧张型头痛患者采用中西医结合治疗临床疗效及其安全性评价。方法:本组128例紧张型头痛患者根据随机数字表法随机分为观察组(n=64)和对照组(n=64)。对照组采用西药治疗,观察组在对照组基础上结合中药汤剂治疗。两组疗程均为4周。结果:观察组治疗后总有效率(92.19%)显著高于对照组(76.56%),且有统计学差异(P<0.05);观察组治疗后发作次数与持续时间均显著低于对照组,且有统计学差异(P<0.05);观察组治疗后血浆黏度和全血还原黏度显著低于治疗前及对照组治疗后,且有统计学差异(P<0.05);两组患者治疗后红细胞压积比较变化无统计学差异(P>0.05);两组患者在治疗过程中均未出现明显的不良反应。结论:紧张型头痛患者采用中西医结合治疗临床疗效显著,安全可靠,具有重要临床意义,值得进一步推广应用。
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of Integrative Medicine in patients with tension-type headache. Methods: A total of 128 patients with tension-type headache were randomly divided into observation group (n = 64) and control group (n = 64) according to the random number table method. The control group was treated with western medicine. The observation group was treated with Chinese medicine decoction on the basis of the control group. Two courses of treatment were 4 weeks. Results: The total effective rate (92.19%) in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (76.56%) (P <0.05); the number and duration of attacks in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P <0.05). After treatment, the plasma viscosity and whole blood reduced viscosity of the observation group were significantly lower than those before treatment and control group (P <0.05). After treatment, the erythrocyte No significant difference was observed in the changes in the pressure (P> 0.05). No significant adverse reactions occurred in the two groups during the course of treatment. Conclusion: Tension-type headache patients treated with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine have significant clinical efficacy, safety and reliability, which has important clinical significance and is worth further promotion and application.