自明清以来,学术笔记的写作几乎已经成了学者的“家常衣饭”,佳作不一而足,泽被后人不浅。现今此道则乏人问津,变为学术研究之“异数”了。一方面,前有钱钟书先生的《管锥编》、《谈艺录》,巍峨耸峙,后人很难生出比肩甚或逾越之想。另一方面,此一时彼一时,即使真有“比肩”或“逾越”的水平,也不讨好。随着近年“学术接轨”声浪的喧哗,这种“述而不作、引而不释、论而不证,及夫一时所思,瞬息灵感,不求征实,漫然述之”,因而“不符现代学术规范”的笔记日渐被置之学术价值评判体系的底端,既在理论上被瞧不起,亦不能申请各级课题或高踞“核心期刊”之一席,自然的,身心两方面的升斗之利亦相应遭到削弱甚而取消了,学人多无此类“蚁聚獭祭”之兴致实在可以理解。 Since the Ming and Qing dynasties, the writing of academic notes has almost become the “home-style clothes” of scholars. Nowadays, there are few people who are interested in this course, becoming the “alien numbers” of academic research. On the one hand, Qian Qian Shu, former director of the “tube cone series”, “talk about art records, towering towering, it is difficult for future generations born shoulder to shoulder or even beyond the imagination. On the other hand, this is not a matter of pleas for the moment, even if it is truly ”shoulder to shoulder“ or ”crossed.“ With the sound of ”academic integration“ in recent years, this kind of ”not to mention, not to mention, not to talk on the matter, but not on the card, and husband a moment of thought, instant inspiration, do not seek truth, Modern academic norms “are increasingly being placed at the bottom of the academic value judging system. They are both theoretically devalued and can not be applied at all levels of the subject or stand one of the” core journals “naturally, both physically and mentally The corresponding benefits have also been weakened or even canceled. There is no such thing as learning about the interest of ”ants and retribes".