论文部分内容阅读
[目的]构建基于积极体验的社区老年人健康干预满意度评价指标体系。[方法]在满意度指数模型和半结构访谈的基础上,结合小组讨论确定备选指标体系,采用Delphi法进行专家咨询,以确定指标体系,最后运用层次分析法确定各指标权重。[结果]专家的权威系数为0.860,判断系数为0.925,熟悉程度为0.800,两轮专家咨询协调系数分别是0.295,0.425,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。最终形成一级指标6项、二级指标14项、三级指标38项的基于积极体验的社区老年人健康干预满意度评价指标体系。[结论]该指标体系专家咨询意见趋于一致,可信度高,可为基于积极体验的社区老年人健康干预的评价提供可量化的参考依据。
[Objective] To construct an index system of satisfaction evaluation of community-based health intervention based on positive experience. [Methods] On the basis of satisfaction index model and semi-structure interviews, combined with the panel discussion to determine the alternative index system, using Delphi method to consult experts to determine the index system, and finally using analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight of each index. [Results] The author’s coefficient of authority was 0.860, the judgment coefficient was 0.925, the familiarity was 0.800, and the consultation coordination coefficient of two experts were 0.295,0.425 respectively, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.001). Finally, 6 indexes of first-level indicators, 14 second-level indicators, 38 third-level indicators were selected to evaluate the satisfaction index of community-based health interventions based on positive experience. [Conclusion] The expert advice of the index system tends to be consistent and has high credibility, which can provide a quantifiable reference for the evaluation of health intervention in the community based on positive experience.