相比于西方对克林思·布鲁克斯持续深入的研究,国内的布鲁克斯研究范围狭窄,水平较低。布鲁克斯是著名的学者、教授、期刊创办者,但中国学界对他的译介与研究都不够全面,且存在诸多误读。如中国学界一般认为布鲁克斯是单纯的形式主义者,以文本为中心,反对历史传记式批评,但是实际上布鲁克斯的理论有一个发展、修正的过程,他研究威廉·福克纳的四部专著体现了他对历史性的重视。国内布鲁克斯研究的不足,主要原因在于第一手资料的缺乏。 Compared to the Western research on Clint Brooks continued in-depth study of the Brookings domestic narrow range, low level. Brooks is a famous scholar, professor, founder of periodicals, but Chinese scholars have not fully and completely misinterpreted and studied him. For example, Chinese scholars generally consider Brooks a mere formalist and take text as the center to oppose historical biographical criticism. In fact, Brooks’s theory has a process of development and revision. The four books he studied in William Faulkner embody His historic emphasis. The lack of domestic Brooks research, mainly due to the lack of first-hand information.