论文部分内容阅读
我国民事诉讼法第185条规定:“最高人民检察院对各级人民法院已经发生法律效力的判决、裁定,上级人民检察院对下级人民法院已经发生法律效力的判决、裁定,发现有下列情形之一的,应当按照审判监督程序提出抗诉:(一) 原判决、裁定认定事实的主要证据不足的;(二) 原判决、裁定适用法律确有错误的;(三) 人民法院违反法定程序,可能影响案件正确判决、裁定的;(四) 审判人员在审理该案件时有贪污受贿,徇私舞弊,枉法裁判行为的。”第186条规定:“人民检察院提出抗诉的案件,人民法院应当再审。”但该法对人民检察院按照审判监督程序向哪级人民法院抗诉,由哪级人民法院再审,没有作出具体明
Article 185 of the Code of Civil Procedure of our country stipulates: “The Supreme People’s Procuratorate has ruled and ruled that the people’s courts at all levels have taken legal effect, and the higher people’s procuratorates have ruled and ruled that the lower people’s courts have taken legal effect, and found that one of the following circumstances (1) The original evidence of the original verdict and ruling is insufficient; (2) The original verdict and ruling of the applicable law are in error; (3) The violation of legal procedures by the people’s court may affect (4) Judges have embezzled, taken bribes, practice malpractices for personal gains, and act in vain to rule the law in adjudicating cases. ”Article 186 stipulates:" When a people’s procuratorate files a protest, the people’s court shall retrial. However, the law of the People’s Procuratorate in accordance with the trial supervision procedures to the level of people’s court protest, by what people’s court retrial, did not make specific