论文部分内容阅读
长篇电视剧《大宅门》在播出之前,即以其不菲的投拍资金、强大的演员阵容和编导者的创作阐述,被媒体竞相报道。开播后,又因其“一路攀升的收视率”,继续得到一些报刊的青睐。这一盛况,是近年来电视圈中所不多见的。这部戏究竟有何妙处?确实值得我们作进一步的总结和探讨。但针对最近一段时间媒体对其宣传的情况来看,在有识之士中也不乏持各种意见者。著名评论家梁光弟同志近日撰文,对上述情况发表了自己的看法。正如梁光弟同志在他文章中所声明的,他的意见,“仅仅是有关(《大宅门》)宣传报道引起的,并不涉及对电视连续剧《大宅门》的评价”。本刊发表梁文,谨希望就此问题引起广大读者重视,并希望各界人士来稿来函,继续发表意见。同时,我们也衷心希望,观看过《大宅门》的观众和专家,对该剧作出及时、客观的评价。稿件以2500字之内为限,短稿更佳。欢迎各界朋友踊跃投稿。
Before the broad-screen TV series “Grand Home Gate” was broadcast, it was reported by the media that it was elaborated by its huge investment funds, powerful cast and director’s creation. After the launch, but also because of its “all the way up the ratings” continue to receive some newspapers of all ages. This grand occasion is rare in the television circle in recent years. What is the beauty of this play? It really deserves our further summary and discussion. However, for the most recent period of media coverage of its situation, there are many people of insight who hold various opinions. Recently, Comrade Liang Guangdi, a famous critic, wrote his own opinion on the above situation. As Comrade Liang Guangdi stated in his article, his opinion was “caused only by the publicity about” The Great Home Door “and does not refer to the evaluation of the TV series Grand Home.” Liang Wen published this article, I hope this issue aroused the attention of readers, and hope that people from all walks of life to write a letter, continue to express their views. At the same time, we also sincerely hope that we have watched the audience and experts of the “Big House Gate” and made a timely and objective assessment of the play. Manuscripts to 2500 words within the limit, short draft better. Welcome friends from all walks of life enthusiastic submission.