论文部分内容阅读
未成年人前科消灭在我国尚未形成制度,但司法实践已经反映了社会的需求。我国现行法律存在的相关矛盾规定既是司法审查制度缺乏的后果,又体现了对于“前科消灭”的矛盾态度。前科制度对于未成年人而言,不但违背了保护未成年人的政策和特殊预防的刑罚目的,也不公正。前科消灭和社会诚信体系的建设并不矛盾,确存在着建立的必要性。其适用对象和条件等应当根据具体情况按照绝对消灭和相对消灭,当然消灭和附条件消灭等区别对待。“前科消灭”的实质是信息检索渠道的阻断,其实现需要一系列的制度保障,例如赋予档案管理部门特定的保密义务,给相关未成年犯提供在遭遇信息泄露、恶意中伤以及升学就业歧视时寻求司法救济的权利。
The elimination of minor criminal records in our country has not yet been formed, but judicial practice has reflected the needs of the community. The existing contradictory provisions existing in the law of our country are not only the consequence of the lack of judicial review system, but also reflect the contradictory attitude toward “extinction ”. The criminal record system for minors not only runs counter to the policy of protecting minors and the penalty purpose of special prevention, but also unfair. Extinction and the construction of social integrity system is not contradictory, there is indeed the need to establish. The applicable objects and conditions shall be treated as such according to the specific circumstances in accordance with the absolute elimination and relative elimination, and of course the elimination and the conditional elimination. The essence of “extermination” is the blockage of information retrieval channels. In fact, it requires a series of system guarantees, such as giving the file management department specific secrecy obligations and providing the relevant juvenile offenders with information disclosure, malicious vilification and further studies The right to seek judicial remedies for discrimination in employment.