在此文中,我企图尝试一种新的批评方式,或曰批评文体。按阅读顺序,“真实”记述当时的感想,将文学性与学理性融为一体。做了十年之久的批评,始觉得,批评既不是学问,亦非研究,目下结构严谨、逻辑思维缜密的长篇大论很难企及批评的“止于至善”之境。转瞬即逝的文学灵感与思想火花虽有悖于逻辑化与学理化的现代批评,但它的“初心”与真实使得那一刹那的存在有如出水芙蓉。我以为,当下的批评缺少的就是这种不加掩饰的真诚。尝试之故,不知以何名之,暂谓“笔记 In this article, I try to try a new way of criticism, or criticism of style. According to the reading order, ”real “ describes the feelings of the time, the literary and academic integration. After ten years of criticism, I began to think that criticism is neither a science nor a study. It is difficult for the long-structured rhetoric with rigorous logic and meticulous thinking to ”stop at the best.“ Although the fleeting literary inspiration and ideological sparks are contrary to the modern criticism of logicalization and academicization, its ”primitiveness“ and reality make the moment exist as a water-filled lotus. I think the lack of immediate criticism is this unflattering truth. Try it, I do not know what the name of the temporary ”" notes