目前,我国学术界就如何重写文学史、思想史、哲学史等学术史问题进行热烈的研讨,从观念、方法和形式诸方面实行革新,这样就不能不对迄今学术史研究的模式进行再思考,建立一个新的术史的研究体系。记得多年前我曾读过《世界文学》刊登的加藤周一先生与我国学者就建立文学史研究新体系等问题的访谈录,以及加藤周一的《日本文学的特征》等文章,它们阐明文学史研究是以哲学思想史为中轴,涉及历史的发展类型、文学的社会性、世界观的背景和语言及其表述法等,也就是说,文学史涉及到文学在文化整体发展中 At present, academics in our country have conducted heated discussions on how to rewrite academic history issues such as literary history, intellectual history and philosophical history, and carried out reforms in terms of concepts, methods and forms so that we can not but rethink the academic history research mode so far , To establish a new history of the research system. I remember many years ago I read articles by Interview with Mr. Kato on Monday, published by World Literature, with our scholar on the establishment of a new system for the study of the history of literature, and Kato’s Monograph on the Characteristics of Japanese Literature on Monday. They illustrated the history of literature It is based on the history of philosophical thought and involves the types of development of history, the sociality of literature, the background of the world outlook and the language and its formulation. In other words, the history of literature involves the development of literature in the overall development of culture