论文部分内容阅读
在道教思想史上,主要由重玄学派提倡的道性论持一种非人类中心主义的生态观;而主要由阴符家发展的盗机论,则持一种弱人类中心主义的立场。双方各自给出了不同的论证方式,既共存于道教思想体系而又互不通约,致使近世道教的生态实践呈现出一定的矛盾:其一,既有大量严格禁止破坏生态环境的戒律,但又有灵活之处;其二,生态保护实践与研究科学技术并重。道教这种看似矛盾的态度,不妨分别摄入胜义谛、世俗谛,即在出世的神圣维度强调人与万物同禀道性;而在入世的世俗维度,则强调人合理支配环境的权利。
In the history of Taoism, the theory of Tao advocated by the heavy metaphysics holds a kind of non-anthropocentric ecological view. The theory of robbery, which is mainly developed by the Yin Fu family, holds a weak anthropocentric standpoint. The two sides each gave different ways of argumentation, which not only coexist with the Taoist ideology but do not communicate with each other, resulting in some contradictions in the ecological practice of recent Taoism. First, there are a large number of precepts strictly forbidden to destroy the ecological environment, Flexible; Second, ecological protection practices and research both science and technology. Taoist this seemingly contradictory attitude may wish to ingest the meaning of the meaning of justice, the secular essence, that in the sacred dimension of birth emphasizes the human and all things with the same nature of anointing; and in the secular dimension of accession to the WTO, emphasize the right to a reasonable control over the environment .