论文部分内容阅读
从清末和“五四”前夕起,国学实际有两个传统:一个是几千年老传统,一个是近百年来形成的新传统。这两个传统至今未能融合的一个重要原因,是因为存在着对新传统——即“新国学”的很大误解,诸如认为“五四”新文化运动是靠所谓“打倒孔家店”、“全盘反传统”起家的;“文革”受“五四”“全盘反传统”的影响等。“五四”虽有偏激,但并不“全盘反传统”。它主张科学民主,与“文革”的个人专制与个人迷信完全不同。
From the end of the Qing Dynasty and the eve of “May Fourth Movement”, there are actually two traditions in Chinese studies: one is the tradition of thousands of years old, and the other is a new tradition formed in the past century. One of the important reasons why the two traditions have not converged so far is that there is a great misunderstanding about the new tradition, namely “New Chinese Learning,” such as thinking that the “May 4th” New Culture Movement relied on the so-called “downfall of the Confucian shop” , “Anti-traditional” started; “Cultural Revolution” by the “May Fourth” “anti-traditional” influence. Although the May Fourth Movement was extreme, it was not “totally anti-traditional.” It claims that scientific democracy is completely different from personal tyranny and personal superstition in the “Cultural Revolution.”