论文部分内容阅读
目的对比腹腔镜下子宫全切同经腹子宫全切术的临床疗效差异。方法选取我院2013年2月~2015年10月收治的94例因子宫良性疾病需行子宫全切治疗的妇科患者作为临床研究对象，采用随机数字分组法将94例患者均分为观察组与对照组两组，观察组47例患者均实施腹腔镜下子宫全切术治疗，对照组47例患者均实施经腹子宫全切术治疗。结果经不同子宫全切手术方案治疗后，观察组47例患者除手术时间指标之外，手术平均出血量、术后首次肛门排气时间、住院时间、镇静剂使用例数等指标水平均显著优于对照组患者，组间差异对比，<0.05。具有统计学意义。结论相比传统经腹子宫全切术而言，腹腔镜下子宫全切术具有着显著的治疗优势，更加适用于各类良性病变引起的全子宫切除患者范畴。“,”Objective To analysis of laparoscopic uterine full cut with abdominal hysterectomy full cut method of the clinical curative effects.Methods Select our hospital from February 2013 to October 2015 admitted during the period of 94 cases with benign uterine diseases need,USES the random number grouping 94 patients were divided into observation group of 47 patients were implemented for the treatment of laparoscopic uterine full cut, control group in 47 patients were implemented for clinical curative effects.Results After treatment with different uterine full cut operation scheme,the observation group of 47 patients in addition to operating time indicators,ambulation time, <0.05,with statistical significance.Conclusion Compared with the traditional abdominal hysterectomy full cut method,laparoscopic uterine full treatment of cut method has the significant advantages,more suitable for all kinds of benign lesions caused by patients with total hysterectomy category.