论文部分内容阅读
在WTO成立之初,对于其争端解决机构法律适用问题曾存在较大争议,DSB专家组和上诉机构的审判实践对其所适用法律范围的界定提供了生动的范例。将WTO争端解决法律渊源划分为正式渊源和解释渊源的做法与DSB司法实践更为接近,在理论上也不易造成混淆。十分有必要重新审视DSB适用法律渊源具体内容、效力层级以及争议产生的原因,这对指导成员国积极参与诉讼并合理预判结果具有重要的理论和实践意义。
At the beginning of the establishment of WTO, there was much controversy over the legal application of its dispute settlement body. The trial practice of the panel of DSBs and the appellate body provided a vivid example of the definition of the scope of the applicable law. The division of the legal origins of the WTO dispute settlement into a formal source and interpretation of origins is closer to the judicial practice of DSB and is less likely to cause confusion in theory. It is very necessary to reexamine the specific contents of DSS applicable law sources, the level of effectiveness and the causes of the disputes. This is of great theoretical and practical significance to guide the member states to actively participate in the litigation and reasonably predict the results.