举证是每种诉讼活动所必不可少的,近年来,法学理论界已越来越重视研究这一课题,其中尤以民事诉讼的举证为突出,相比之下,刑事诉讼的举证却少人问津。然而,实践走到了理论前面,1988年12月6日,上海市中级人民法院公开审理了被告人朱文博故意杀人、抢劫一案,该案开庭中采取了由公诉人当庭举证的做法,令人耳目一新,引起了司法界和法学界 Evidence is indispensable for each kind of litigation activity. In recent years, the legal theory circle has paid more and more attention to the research of this subject, especially the evidence of civil litigation is outstanding. In contrast, the evidence of criminal litigation is few Intimacy. However, in practice, the practice came to the front of the theory. On December 6, 1988, the Shanghai Intermediate People’s Court publicly held the case of intentional murder and robbery of the defendant Zhu Wenbo. In the trial of the case, he took the proof that the prosecutor came to court in court. Refreshing, aroused the judiciary and law circles