论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨微波凝固法治疗宫颈炎的临床价值及可行性。方法选择2012年5月—2013年4月收治的宫颈炎患者120例纳入本研究,根据宫颈糜烂程度分为A组(Ⅰ度糜烂)35例、B组(Ⅱ度糜烂)48例、C组(Ⅲ度糜烂)37例。三组均接受微波凝固法治疗。比较三组疗效、不良反应。计数资料采用χ2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果 A组、B组、C组总有效率分别为100.00%、83.33%、78.38%,与A组对比,B组、C组总有效率明显较低,组间比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。B组、C组总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组、B组、C组不良反应发生率分别为40.00%、41.67%、40.54%,三组不良反应发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论采用微波凝固法治疗宫颈炎症可取得满意的疗效,其中Ⅰ度宫颈糜烂效果更好,治疗期间不良反应轻微,在今后的临床工作中应重视对宫颈炎症的早期治疗。
Objective To investigate the clinical value and feasibility of microwave coagulation therapy for cervicitis. Methods 120 patients with cervicitis treated in our hospital from May 2012 to April 2013 were enrolled in this study. According to the degree of cervical erosion, there were 35 patients in group A (Ⅰ degree erosion), 48 patients in group B (Ⅱ degree erosion), and group C (Ⅲ degree erosion) in 37 cases. Three groups were treated with microwave coagulation. Compare the efficacy of the three groups, adverse reactions. Count data using χ2 test, P <0.05 for the difference was statistically significant. Results The total effective rates of group A, group B and group C were 100.00%, 83.33% and 78.38% respectively. Compared with group A, the total effective rate of group B and group C was significantly lower and the difference between groups was statistically significant ( All P <0.05). There was no significant difference in total effective rate between group B and group C (P> 0.05). The incidences of adverse reactions in group A, group B and group C were 40.00%, 41.67% and 40.54% respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions among the three groups (all P> 0.05). Conclusion Microwave coagulation therapy for cervical inflammation can achieve satisfactory results, including degree Ⅰ cervical erosion better, minor adverse reactions during treatment, in the future clinical work should pay attention to the early treatment of cervical inflammation.