论文部分内容阅读
众所周知的微信商标纠纷案,关于创博亚太公司和腾讯公司的商标纠纷案引出了我们对公共利益的思考。法院认定创博亚太公司注册了微信商标将损害微信用户的公共利益,因为容易引起相关公众对在先使用的腾讯推出的微信服务的混淆。那么这个公共利益到底是微信用户的利益还是腾讯公司的利益呢?定义公共利益解决的是怎么适用公共利益这一法律条文的问题,界定公共利益解决的是确定法律适用范围的问题。针对目前的定义不明确的现状,本文认这首先解决好这两个问题我们才能更好地了解如何维护公共利益,如何从实质上保护公共利益。
The well-known WeChat trademark dispute case on trademark infringement involving Chuangbo Asia-Pacific and Tencent drew our thoughts on the public interest. The court found Chuangbo Asia Pacific registered a WeChat trademark in the public interest of WeChat users because of the confusion caused by the relevant public to WeChat launched by Tencent. So the public interest in the end is the interests of WeChat users or the interests of Tencent? Definition of the public interest is how to apply the public interest of the legal provisions of the problem, define the public interest is to determine the scope of application of the law. In view of the current situation of undefined definition, this article recognizes that to solve these two problems first, we can better understand how to safeguard the public interest and how to protect the public interest in essence.