论文部分内容阅读
目的测定分析试色糊剂与相应颜色的树脂粘结剂间颜色的一致性和差异。为全瓷修复时应用此种材料提供经验和依据。方法应用光电比色仪及ＣＩＥＬａｂ色度系统，对Ｖａｒｉｏｌｉｎｋ三种颜色的试色糊剂与相应颜色的树脂粘结剂进行颜色测量和分析。结果２００号试色糊剂与相应的化学固化树脂的颜色相比，△Ｅ＜１．４。其余树脂粘结剂与相应的试色糊剂相比较，△Ｅ值均大于３３。结论２００号试色糊剂与化学固化树脂粘结剂的颜色一致性最好，但试色糊剂较光固化树脂粘结剂略亮、略黄。与试色糊剂相比，１００号树脂粘结剂略暗、略黄，３００号树脂粘结剂略亮、略黄，颜色均有明显差异。
Objective To determine the color consistency and difference between the test color paste and the corresponding color resin binder. All-ceramic repair application of such materials to provide experience and basis. Methods The colorimetric method and the CIELab colorimetric system were used to measure the color of the Variolink test pastes and the corresponding color resin binders. Results 200 test color paste with the corresponding chemical curing resin color, △ E * <1.4. The remaining resin binders compared with the corresponding test pastes, △ E values were greater than 3 3. Conclusion The color consistency of No.200 test color paste and chemical curing resin binder is the best, but the test color paste is slightly brighter and slightly yellow than the light curing resin binder. Compared with the trial color paste, No. 100 resin adhesive slightly darker, slightly yellow, No. 300 resin adhesive slightly bright, slightly yellow, the color was significantly different.