论文部分内容阅读
目的通过对本地区常住儿童和流动儿童计划免疫接种率和接种及时率的比较,了解本地区儿童计划免疫现状,为加强计划免疫工作提供依据。方法以疫苗接种率、接种及时率为指标,调查和对比分析本地区常住儿童和流动儿童“五苗”接种情况及相关资料。结果本地儿童平均接种率为99.33%,外地儿童平均接种率为96.57%,两者差异有统计学意义;本地儿童平均接种及时率为93.35%,外地儿童平均接种及时率为89.04%,两者差异有统计学意义。其中,除卡介苗、乙肝疫苗第一针接种率、接种及时率差异无统计学意义外,其它针次的疫苗常住人口接种率、接种及时率均明显高于流动人口,且差异有统计学意义,尤其是接种及时率。结论常住儿童计划免疫接种情况较好,但是流动儿童疫苗接种率、接种及时率与常住儿童比较仍有相当大的差距,需要进一步加强。
Objective To understand the planned immunization status of children in this area by comparing the planned immunization rates and timely immunization rates of children living and migrant in this area and provide basis for strengthening planned immunization. Methods Vaccination rate and timely vaccination rate were used as indexes to investigate and compare the inoculation status of infants and migrant children Results The average vaccination rate of local children was 99.33% and the average vaccination rate of foreign children was 96.57%, the difference was statistically significant. The average vaccination time rate of local children was 93.35%, and the average vaccination rate of foreign children was 89.04% There is statistical significance. Among them, in addition to BCG, hepatitis B vaccine first needle inoculation rate, vaccination and timely rate difference was not statistically significant, the other needle vaccination resident population vaccination rate, vaccination and timely rate were significantly higher than the floating population, and the difference was statistically significant, Especially vaccination timely rate. Conclusions The planned immunization of resident children is better. However, there is still a considerable gap between the vaccination rate and the vaccination rate of floating children and those of the resident children, which needs to be further strengthened.