论文部分内容阅读
上海博物馆在上世纪60年代曾收集到一件!,马承源先生著文指出!当为晋器。此观点得到了学术界的一致同意,如吴镇烽《金文人名汇编》等均认为器主“长子沫臣”为晋人,而搜集楚器较为著名的如刘彬徽《楚系金文汇编》等亦未收此器。本文对长子沫臣!进行综合研究,通过此!中出现的“芈”姓,初步认定其当为楚国器;再考订铭文字体的特点与南方楚系文字接近,而与中原同期文字字形较远;由铭文右行以及“!”类器在中原及楚系中出现的频率及制作的精粗等,论定此长子沫臣!实为楚器。最后,联系鹿邑太清宫长子口墓及湖北黄陂发现的长子狗鼎等,认为此!铭中之“长”与长子口、长子狗之长实有相承关系,由此初步推测了西周时期长国、厉国的迁徙方向。
Shanghai Museum in the 1960s have collected one !, Mr. Ma Chengyuan pointed out that the text! This view has been unanimously agreed by academics. For example, Wu Zhenfeng, “Compilation of Jin and Jin Poets,” all considered that “the eldest son of Mo Chen” was a Jin person and the more famous Chu artifact was collected. For instance, And so have not received this device. In this article, the “芈 ” surname appeared in this article, which is initially identified as Chu nationality; then the characteristics of the inscription fonts are similar to those of the Chu style in the south, while the texts of the same period of the Central Plains Fonts far; by the right line of the inscription and “!” “Class” in the Central Plains and Chu Chu appeared in the frequency and the production of fine, on this eldest child Mo Chen! Finally, contact Lu Yi Tai Qing Miraculous Tomb and Hubei Huangpi found the eldest dog Ding, think this! Ming in “long ” and the eldest son of the mouth, the eldest son of the dog has its own relationship, which was initially speculated Long March during the Western Zhou Dynasty, Li country migration direction.