论文部分内容阅读
案情:“皇家橄榄石”号登记船东为GSH2公司,HJ公司和ND有限公司分别系该船的光租人和定期租船人。为履行外贸合同,SF公司于2011年8月17日与ND有限公司就“皇家橄榄石”号订立航次租船合同。甲基乙基酮在宁波港被装上“皇家橄榄石”号,上海外轮代理浦东有限公司代表该船船长在上海签发了该批货物的9份凭指示油轮提单,提单记载SF公司为托运人,装货港为宁波港,卸货港为印度坎德拉港,各份提单均记载租约的所有条款和除外条款都包含在提单中,租约格式为ASBATANKVOY。2011年10月26日,两批涉案货物运抵印度坎德拉港,并于次日完成卸货。各方共同参与了对涉案货物装货港岸罐样、卸货港岸罐样、卸货港船舱样的共同检验。同年12月17日,检验机构出具报告显示:装船前的岸罐样品在水含量、颜色、酸度和密度等方面已不符合标准,卸货港岸罐样与装货港岸罐样相比,在颜色、酸度方面指标增高。2012年10月25日,SF公司以运输途中发生货损为由提起本案诉讼,请求判令HJ公司赔偿其经济损失1 112 065.79美元及利息。HJ公司答辩称,SF公司不是适格原告,HJ公司也不是适格被告,SF公司与案外人ND有限公司签订承租合同,存在书面租约,提单签发人为上海外代浦东公司,SF公司应依合同向案外人ND有限公司索赔,请求驳回SF公司的诉请。
Case: “Royal Peridot” registered owner GSH2 Company, HJ Company and ND Co., Ltd. are the optical charterers and regular charterers of the ship respectively. In order to fulfill its foreign trade contract, SF Company entered into a voyage charter party with ND Limited on August 17, 2011 for Royal Peridot. Methyl ethyl ketone in Ningbo Port was loaded “Royal olivine ”, Shanghai Shipping Agency Pudong Co., Ltd. on behalf of the ship’s captain in Shanghai, the shipment of 9 copies of the instructions with the tanker bill of lading, bill of lading records SF Shipper, the port of loading Ningbo Port, the port of discharge is Candela port, India, all the bills of lading record all the terms and conditions of the lease are included in the bill of lading, the lease form ASBATANKVOY. On October 26, 2011, two batches of goods arrived in Candela Port, India, and the unloading was completed the next day. All parties participated jointly in the joint inspection of tank-like samples of port loading of cargoes involved in loading, cans of discharging ports and sampling of cargo tanks at the port of discharge. December 17 the same year, the inspection agency issued a report shows: shore before loading the tank samples in terms of water content, color, acidity and density has not met the standard, In color, acidity indicators increased. On October 25, 2012, SF filed a lawsuit in the light of cargo damage occurred in transit and requested that HJ Company be ordered to make compensation in the amount of USD1,1212,065.79 for economic losses and interest. HJ Company pleaded that SF Company is not a qualified plaintiff, HJ Company is not a qualified defendant, SF Company signed a tenancy contract with an outsider ND Co., Ltd., there is a written lease, the signatory of the bill of lading is Shanghai Foreign Pudong and SF should be in accordance with the contract Claim to outsiders ND Co., Ltd. for dismissal of SF Company’s petition.