联邦最高普通法院(第六审判庭)2000年12月12日《新法学周刊》2001年第964页ZIP 2001年第379页《法学工作者报》2001年第711页事实原告,生于1982年8月31日,以其乳牙受损而要求赔偿。这是因为由先前的第一被告所制造的一种儿童茶产品在没有做出足够警示(的情况下),在其出生的前两年通过一种塑料饮水瓶(被告将其与茶饮料一起销售)而不断提供给原告。1985年牙医告诉原告的母亲他的牙齿损害是由茶产品造成的。1993年秋天她参考了当地相关健康保险关于一个诉讼 Supreme Court of the Commonwealth (6th Chamber) 12 December 2000 New Law Weekly No. 964 ZIP 2001 Page 379 2001 Juridical Workers Page 711 Factual Plaintiff, Born in 1982 August 31, with its deciduous teeth damaged and demanded compensation. This is because a children’s tea product manufactured by a former first defendant, without adequate warning, passed a plastic drinking bottle two years prior to his birth (the defendant brought it with the tea drink Sales) and continue to provide plaintiffs. In 1985 the dentist told the plaintiff’s mother that his tooth damage was caused by the tea product. In the fall of 1993, she consulted with local health insurance about a lawsuit