论文部分内容阅读
岁末年初,“异地高考”成为了一个社会热门话题,甚至出现了用“行为艺术”(上海打工者的“街头抗议”)来争取高考权利的现象。而在今年“两会”期间,更有专家发出“教育部应该主导异地高考”的呼吁,使争论愈发激烈。对于这次激烈的异地高考争论,作者以为若从争论的直接目的来看,可见争论者们所争的都是自己的权益(这当然无可厚非)。其中“支持者”们争的是“打工者或外地人”子女的高考权利,亦即“外地人”的权益。反对者们争的是“城市人或本地人”子女的高考权利,亦即“本地
At the beginning of the year and the beginning of the year, ”college entrance examination“ has become a hot topic in society, and even the phenomenon of ”performance art“ (”street protest“ by migrant workers in Shanghai) has come to win the college entrance examination. During this year’s ”two sessions,“ more experts issued an appeal that ”the Ministry of Education should lead the entrance examinations in different places“ so that the debate will become increasingly fierce. For this intense debate off-campus entrance examination, the author thinks that if from the direct purpose of the argument point of view, it can be seen that all the contestants are competing for their own rights (which of course is understandable). Among them ”supporters “ fight for ”migrant workers or outsiders “ children’s college entrance examination rights, that is, ”outsiders “ rights. Opponents contend that the ”city or locals“ children’s college entrance examination rights, that is, ”local