“范跑跑事件”的评价角度是多元的,各有其独特意义,但从平等对话,理性分析,将问题引向深入方面看,宪法学视角不应缺位。基于该视角,事件中当事人范美中虽受到网民的道德谴责,但并未遭遇不民主或因“多数人的暴政”需要救济的问题,其言论自由没有也不能被限制,相反,却在现代媒体的作用下得到了充分实现;作为一名教师,其人身自主权依法本该受到限制,但遗憾的是,至今媒体所披露的其可能被解聘的理由却只是“没有教师资格证”。从技术角度看,这是稳妥可行的,但该事件的宪法学意义却被消弭掉了。 “Fan running event ” evaluation point of view is diverse, each with its own unique significance, but from the perspective of equal dialogue and rational analysis, to lead the issue in-depth aspects, the perspective of constitutional law should not be absent. Based on this perspective, although Fan Mi-chung, the party involved in the incident, has been morally condemned by netizens, he has not encountered the problem of being underemployed or in need of relief because of “tyranny of the majority”. His freedom of speech can not and can not be restricted. On the contrary, The role of the media has been fully realized; as a teacher, his personal autonomy should be limited in accordance with the law, but unfortunately, the media has so far disclosed its possible grounds for dismissal is only "no teacher certificate . From a technical point of view, this is safe and sound, but the constitutional significance of the incident has been eliminated.