论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,“引渡”被视为国际法和国际刑法的一个范畴。法学界也通常认为引渡法的性质应确定为刑事特别法,是从属于刑法和刑事诉讼法的“子法”。引渡法与国际法、国际刑法以及国内刑事诉讼法有着密切的联系,但引渡法地位和体系具有相对独立性:法渊、立法模式和调整的对象不同,在规范体系的建构上,明显反映在“引渡诉讼”程序上。而且,引渡法的这种相对独立性正随着国际犯罪、跨国犯罪以及国际交流便利所致的罪犯外逃现象的增多而得到加强。
For a long time, “extradition” has been regarded as a category of international law and international criminal law. The jurisprudence generally also thinks that the nature of the extradition law should be defined as the special law of criminal law, subordinate to the “sub-law” of criminal law and criminal procedure law. The law of extradition is closely linked with international law, international criminal law and domestic criminal procedure law. However, the status and system of extradition law are relatively independent: the law and legislative model are different from those of the adjustment. In the construction of the regulatory system, “Extradition proceedings” procedure. Moreover, this relative independence of the law on extradition is being strengthened with the increase of criminals fleeing as a result of international crimes, transnational crimes and the facilitation of international exchanges.