论文部分内容阅读
本文针对延长审查逮捕期限的议案,从诉讼法及法社会学视野下进行了简要评述。逮捕作为最严厉的刑事强制措施,相关的制度构建无不体现着保障犯罪嫌疑人基本人权与国家利益的激烈冲突,制度是否合理也绝非单纯以逻辑分析就能得出妥当的结论。作为人民的代表,其对刑事诉讼制度的理解也在很大程度上代表着广大民众对刑事诉讼法的认知,而人民对于法律的认知是判断法律是否有实效的重要标准,提案合理与否的问题并非仅仅是“与理论产物的对比”。
This article aims to extend the review of the arrest deadline motion, from the perspective of procedural law and sociology of law conducted a brief review. Arrest as the most severe criminal coercive measure, the relevant system construction all embodies the fierce conflict that guarantees the basic human rights of criminal suspects and the national interests. Whether the system is reasonable or not can be concluded by logical analysis. As a representative of the people, their understanding of the criminal procedure system also largely represents the general public’s recognition of the Criminal Procedure Law. People’s cognition of the law is an important criterion for judging the validity of the law. The proposal is reasonable The question of whether or not is not merely a “comparison with the theoretical product.”