论文部分内容阅读
如何从编辑的角度,对科学论文的价值做出正确的判断,是编辑学研究中一个极具现实意义和应用价值的命题。问题的难点在于,科技编辑对所要审理的学术论文,有可能是不甚熟悉甚至是非常陌生的。这就要求科技编辑必须探索和创造出一套普适于科学论文的审稿方法。这需要经验的积累和理论的升华。 科学论文的价值是一种客观存在,它不依编辑的意志为转移。但是,由于科学论文必须通过编辑这一中介才能得以传播,从而体现自身价值,因此,编辑能否对论文的价值正确地作出判断,就具有十分重要的意义了。笔者在这里提出判断科学论文价值的三项准则,供编辑同仁参考。 1.首创性准则 科学,是对未知世界的探索,其本质就是创新。问题是,编辑如何判断论文所提出的理论、观点是否属于首创。 笔者以为,判断论文的内容是否属于首创,最直接、最有效的方法,就是审查论文的“引言”部分。引言,是学术论文的起点,它所要阐述的是,为什么要从事本研究工作,本研究工作的意义何在,与本课题相关的前人的成果和知识空白是什么,本研究将填补哪些
How to make correct judgment on the value of a scientific essay from the point of view of editing is a proposition of great practical significance and application value in the study of editing science. The crux of the problem is that scientific editors may not be familiar or even unfamiliar with the academic papers they are about to hear. This requires that editors of science and technology must explore and create a reviewing method that is universally applicable to scientific papers. This requires the accumulation of experience and the distillation of theory. The value of scientific papers is an objective existence, it does not shift according to the editor’s will. However, because the scientific dissertation must be edited through this medium in order to be able to spread so as to reflect its own value, it is of great significance for editors to correctly judge the value of the dissertation. The author here put forward three criteria for judging the value of scientific papers for editorial colleagues reference. 1. The first principle of science, is to explore the unknown world, its essence is innovation. The question is, how does the editor judge whether the theory proposed in the essay is original or not? In my opinion, the most direct and effective way to judge whether the content of the essay is first or foremost is to review the “Introduction” part of the essay. The introduction, which is the starting point of the academic thesis, is to elaborate on why it is necessary to engage in this research work. What is the significance of this research work? What are the achievements and gaps in knowledge of the predecessors related to this topic?