论文部分内容阅读
期后背书在不同立法例上存在不同的界定,它们体现了不同的立法观念。我国票据法杂糅着不同立法例上的期后背书制度,忽略了该制度背后隐藏的票据法理念,造成了不当后果。基于票据法关于期后背书规定的比较分析,我国票据法关于期后背书的规定应予以修正,重新界定期后背书,确立期后背书与期前背书的推定规则,并在确定期后背书法律效果为一般债权转让效力的基础上,赋予特殊情形下期后背书之被背书人主张善意取得的权利。
After the endorsement of different legislation on the existence of different definitions, they embody different legislative concepts. The promissory notes system in our country is mixed with the endorsement system of different legislation, ignoring the hidden law of negotiable instruments behind the system and causing undue consequences. Based on the comparative analysis of the law of negotiable instruments regarding the endorsement of the period, the provisions on the endorsement of the negotiable instrument law in our country should be amended, the endorsement of the end of the period and the presumption of endorsement after the end of the defined period should be revised, The effect is based on the effectiveness of the transfer of general claims, which gives the endorsee of endorsement under special circumstances the right to claim goodwill in the special circumstances.