论文部分内容阅读
《劳动合同法》的颁布实施引起了很大反响。企业界、专家学者纷纷表示了自己的看法,有人认为:《劳动合同法》在无固定期限条款上存在着制度缺陷,政府在立法上过多干预市场会导致“三输”的结果;有人将《劳动合同法》比喻为洪水猛兽,认为它的实施必将挫伤改革的积极性,要求修改、缓行的呼声很高。那么,这样一部历经多审依然顶着巨大压力颁布并实施的《劳动合同法》想要传递的信息又可以怎样解读呢?
The promulgation and implementation of the “Labor Contract Law” has aroused great repercussions. Some people in the industry, experts and scholars have expressed their own views. Some people think that there are institutional defects in the “Labor Contract Law” on the terms with no fixed term, and too much government intervention in the market will lead to the result of “three losses” Some people compared the Labor Contract Law to the scourge of the floods, believing that its implementation will surely dampen the enthusiasm of the reform and require a lot of calls for amendment and deferral. So how can such a “labor contract law” promulgated and implemented after many trials and tremendous pressures be transmitted? How can we interpret this information?