论文部分内容阅读
当与一处领地遭遇时,与维度相关的逻辑并不发生改变:尺度并不构成一个议题。关于特大都市(megalopolis)的问题,若其诠释依据着一种系统的语言,而该系统出自20世纪60年代的诸多全球化理论,那么无论它具备怎样的敏锐度抑或复杂性,都是一个障碍。但反过来,如果把它理解成一种对视的逻辑,针对的是一个多元的景观,那么它就是管用的。那种把建筑学客体引入到基地,并在二者之间创制出关系和力度的任务,在更大的一个尺度上,是追随着领地间关系所创制的。然而,更复杂的一个议题却是,这些地方里再现的不成比例,
The logic associated with dimensions does not change when encountering a territory: scales do not constitute an issue. With regard to megalopolis, if its interpretation is based on a systematic language derived from the many theories of globalization in the 1960s, no matter what its acumen or sophistication is an obstacle . But conversely, if it is understood as a logic of the opposite, aimed at a pluralistic landscape, then it is useful. The task of introducing the object of architecture into the base and of creating the relationship and intensity between the two is, to a much larger scale, pursued by the relationship between the territories. However, a more complicated issue is the disproportionate reproduction of these places,