论文部分内容阅读
同样性质、同样情节、同样后果的犯罪,受到不同的处罚,必然会引起人们对法律公正的怀疑,动摇人们对法律的信仰和信心。量刑基准是犯罪行为量化阶段最为重要的内容,以往的司法实践仅仅将量刑基准作为理论上探讨的问题,对于量刑基准进行研究将有助于把握量刑基准的设立标准,为司法实践提供较为科学的理论依据。本文从量刑基准的本质和实践经验出发,提出“量刑基准应由基准事实和基准刑两部分组成”的论点。
The same nature, the same plot, the same consequences of crime, subject to different penalties, will inevitably lead to people’s doubts about the law fair, shaken people’s belief in the law and confidence. The sentencing benchmark is the most important content in the criminalization stage of quantification. In the past, judicial practice only used the sentencing benchmarks as the theoretical issues to be studied. To study the sentencing benchmarks will help to grasp the establishment standards of the sentencing benchmarks and provide a more scientific Theoretical basis. Based on the essence and practical experience of sentencing standards, this paper puts forward the argument that the sentencing standards should be composed of two parts: the basic facts and the basic sentencing.