论文部分内容阅读
【新闻背景】前不久的一天,某法庭里座无虚席。在法官的左右两侧,分别坐着原告小玲的母亲和律师,被告医院的代表和律师。经过原告和被告双方几轮控辩之后,法院做出判决:受害人小玲12岁,三好学生,有音乐天赋,能弹一手好钢琴,因发热咳嗽住院,给予当天静脉点滴庆大霉素8万单位,其母亲提请医生为防止庆大霉素的耳毒性,建议改用他药,医生未予采纳又连用两天。受害人在第二天即诉耳鸣。出院至今半年有余其耳鸣加重且听力有轻度损伤,经多方医治无效。本案不属医疗事故,但给受害人造成了难以逆转的后遗症。以民事伤
【News Background】 Not long ago, a court seated. On the left and right sides of the judge, the mother and lawyer of the plaintiff Xiao Ling, representatives of the defendant hospital and lawyers were sitting. After several rounds of prosecution and defense between the plaintiff and the defendant, the court made a verdict: The victim Xiaoling was 12 years old. The three good students, who have musical talents, can play the piano well. He was hospitalized due to fever and cough, and he was given intravenous gentamicin on the same day. 8 In 10,000 units, her mother requested the doctor to recommend the use of his drug to prevent the ototoxicity of gentamicin. The doctor did not adopt it and used it for two days. The victim complained of tinnitus the next day. He has been discharged for more than half a year and his tinnitus has increased and his hearing has been slightly impaired. He has been treated with no cure. The case was not a medical accident but it caused irreversible sequelae to the victim. With civil injury