随着学术的地方转向,研究区域史与地方史,探析基层地方社会实态成为不少学者的选择。当在“整体史”视野下细化“地方性”研究的研究路径成为一种趋向时,当研究力求跳出“死”的制度进入“活”的领域时,那些能反映百姓日常生活实态、听到不同阶层的“声音”、获取“活”的文本等内容的地方档案显得尤为重要。时下,历史学、法学、文献学、考古学、历史地理学等不同领域的学科开始关注并利用档案。当运用多学科研究的理念探寻历史事实时,与其说档案在不断的丰满、充实我们的学术研究,毋宁说是我们在不同学科视野下探寻档案中的历史。档案较为真实的反应一地的社会实态,但一地的历史又绝非仅仅靠档案就能了解,唯有将档案 With the turning of academic places, the study of regional history and local history, exploring the social reality of grass-roots local society has become the choice of many scholars. When the research path of refinement of “endemic” research becomes a trend in the context of “whole history”, when the study seeks to jump out of the “dead” system into the realm of “living”, those Local files that reflect the realities of daily life of the people, hear “syllables” of different classes, and get text such as “living” are especially important. Now, history, law, literature, archeology, history and geography and other disciplines began to pay attention to and use of files. When using the concept of multidisciplinary research to explore the historical facts, the archives are not so much to enrich our academic research as much as they are, but rather to explore the history of archives in different disciplines. File more realistic response to the social reality, but the history of a place and not by file alone can understand, only the file